Greenwich Woman Testifies In Norwalk Cop’s Intercourse Assault Trial
Regarding the very first day’s an endeavor against a Norwalk police officer accused of intimately assaulting a 13-year-old woman, the alleged victim, now 20, took the witness stand and told the jury Anthony Santo stuck their hand down her jeans and touched her intimately while her dad and bro had been resting close to them.
Santo seemed on without emotion whilst the incident was described by the woman at state Superior Court in Stamford. Santo ended up being an 18-year person in the Norwalk Police Department before October of 2009 as he had been arrested on costs of second-degree assault that is sexual danger of problems for a young child. He’s got been on unpaid administrative leave since their arrest.
The alleged victim stated Santo ended up being a friend that is close of household and invested lots of time at their property in Greenwich. The girl stated she could inform Santo things she could maybe not discuss with her “strict parents” and described Santo as her “second daddy. “
The girl had been not able to pinpoint the precise date regarding the attack, but stated she ended up being about 13 during the time. The witness stated she was at her pajamas sitting for a settee inside her family room while the two might have been discussing masturbation or being groped by another kid whenever Santo touched her. Your ex said there was an electric outage that and her father and brother may have been sleeping on a mattress in the living room when the incident took place night.
The lady stated she didn’t inform anybody in regards to the event until belated 2007, whenever she told her boyfriend.
During the time, your ex said she had been therefore young she failed to realize something bad had happened, although she stated she straight away went to your restroom to get herself.
“I didn’t know very well what was happening, I didn’t realize the emotions I happened to be that is having did not understand it had been incorrect. I didn’t know any single thing, ” she stated.
Prior to your ex and Santo had been to just simply take a visit together to Florida to go to a family member of Santo’s in July 2009, the boyfriend called authorities and reported the assault that is sexual described to him significantly more than per year earlier in the day.
Santo, that has remained free on $25,000 relationship since their arrest, would sporadically lean in to speak with their lawyer, Gary Mastronardi, during the roughly 90 mins of testimony the lady provided each day.
Moments after Mastronardi started their cross assessment, the lady begun to cry after she made the allegation against Santo, a close friend as she was asked in a stern tone why her father was angry with her.
“He ended up being upset with you because he didn’t think you. He did not www.321sexchat.com believe your tale, ” Mastronardi said.
Judge Richard Comerford then provided the lady a few moments to write by herself before continuing.
Whenever Mastronardi started once more, he asked to truly have the exact same concern duplicated, but an objection to a follow-up led Comerford to clear the jury through the courtroom.
Prior to meal, Mastronardi outlined their strategy during a disagreement with senior Assistant State’s Attorney Maureen Ornousky on how far in to the woman’s dating back ground he will be in a position to get while protecting Santo.
Mastronardi stated he wished to phone witnesses to buttress their concept that the lady had made within the story concerning the sexual attack to make her boyfriend jealous.
“My place is she managed to get up. I am perhaps not trying to soil her reputation, ” stated Mastronardi, incorporating that by participating in this bid for envy, she dragged an innocent individual in to a unlawful cost.
Mastronardi stated while attempting to alert the authorities from the instance, perhaps the woman’s dad stated the jealous boyfriend “plugged Tony Santo involved with it. “
Mastronardi stated the lady had composed another severe intimate allegation about someone, but authorities decided to go with to not ever prosecute the so-called perpetrator of this intimate attack since the story was so bizarre it might never be thought.
More witnesses may be called in the case likely to use the rest of the to decide week.